obstructive authority 6 Coroners Office

   

Despite the coroner telling me in his letter of 18th September 2014 that the Soliciter General must decide if a coroners inquest is to be continued; the law allows coroners to decide this themselves, as I knew the whole time.  The Crown Law Office have been saying the past three years that they will not have an inquest as there is no new evidence, and the Coroners have been saying it's not for them to decide.  There is easily new evidence due to the perjury at my trial of the three Crown experts who initially all supported it was a low level fall, but then changed their minds when I was enquiring as to doctors conduct in medical neglect manslaughter and the murder by morhpine overdose of Melissa.  Dr K himself, the chief Crown 'expert' who contributed most to getting me convicted and has the most face to save in this case, himself, has published very contrary research to what he said at trial, although six years into that 10 year review at the time of trial.
     Anyway, the Coroner has decided to have a coroners inquest for Moko, a child brutally tortured to death recently, despite the courts having got people convicted.  I have been told by the coroners Office and Crown Law Office repeatedly the past three years, that the Coroner had to go by the "facts" of my case (although they refuse to tell me by what "facts" they went by) as it was against the public interest to pay for "another" hearing that had already been the means by which the truth should have been aired.
     That is not the only lie told to me by the Crown Law Office and Coroners Office.  More to come in obstruction authority Crown Law Office.  Of course the difference in Mokos case and Melissa's, is that I am not responsible for Melissa's death.  I have just been scapegoated for it.  Doctors will never be held to account in this country.  They can break the law as they please.  Moko didn't survive long enough for the doctors to refuse him treatment then euthanase him.
     The correspondance e-mail of November 5th 2014 outlines the laws the Crown Law Office and Coroners Office are breaking, by not having a coroners inquest for Melissa.  They have an incorrect date of death and no cause on the death certificate and yet teh Crown Law Office and coroners keep parroting over and over again that they have had a coroners inquest, as their excuse to not "have another".  They have not had one.

Prep for murder 7

It didn't matter how Melissa was improving and progressing.  She was very stable by hospital notes and breathing 1:1 with the machine at the stage they decided to pull the plug followed by a morphine overdose, when she refused to die and great pressure was put on her parents by government authorities not wanting to do unpaid overtime, wanting it done already.  Them saying her SEP's were absent and equivocal (questionable/ambiguous), her eyes were fixed and dilated, that she had Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI) and that she showed no neurological function, supported their plan to euthanase her.  All of these excuses were untrue and proven to be incorrect.The SEP's result gave a perfectly normal reading for the left hemishpere of the brain.  As can be seen in the hospital note, one eye was not fixed and dilated and was responding.  That hospital note also shows Melissa's movements and neurological function, only a few hours before they pulled the plug.   However, I believe she was again given paralytics and sedatives to make her much more unresponsive prior to her parents arrival at her bedside.

Prep for murder 6

Speaks for itself.  The plan as put in place by Dr Gabrielle Nuthall.  The Codman monitor began to show Melissa's brain pressure was improving "trending upward", at the stage Dr Nuthall ordered it be removed.  Dr Tavey Dorofaeef puts instructions in that no-one should perform CPR and to notify Dr Nuthall if this situation develops.  Dr Nuthall had already prepped Melissa for a morphine overdose though, so of course the situation was not going to arise.

Judge Lynton Stevens does a finger to the law for sentencing

Judge Lynton Stevens does a finger to the law for sentencing

Mr HJ, crown prosecutor (633) at summing up said “Crown says that the mechanism of death involved impact.  Involved impact!  It did involve impact and we are agreed on that.  The debate is not that impact involved death, but what caused the impact.  You can exclude shaking alone.  To be legally culpable, legally responsible for that, that mechanism has to have caused Melissa’s death.”
Judge Stevens repeated it was impact many times in summing up.  “I have set out what the Crown allegation is, that the unlawful act was an assault by the accused by impacting the head of the deceased” (T 694).

At sentencing Judge Stevens changed his story from impact to accepting as fact “solely shaking” and said “I accept that was the way in which the case was originally put to trial but…..(bla bla BS)”. Durrrrr Judge Stevens, it’s what you used to get me convicted at summing up because that’s all the evidence proved!!!!!!! (801)

The crown prosecutor persisted with impact for sentencing, but was totally disregarded by Judge Stevens.  (7, 8 crown submission for sentence).  Your honesty in this regard did not go un-noticed by me Mr HJ!

I have not given up on getting the truth out. You can all stonewall me as much as you can and you will not succeed. As that idiot judge told me at sentencing Melissa’s family deserve to know the truth.

Prep for murder 5

Melissa had fixed and dilated pupils when the opthamologist gave her eye drops. This was when the neurologist did his assessment, as well as when she was under paralytics and sedatives to keep her GSC low. He determined that Melissa was neurologically basically dead and gone of course. However, one of her eyes was functioning as it should when these eye drops wore off and research shows that there is favorable outcome with recovery when at least one eye is responding. Defence was never given a drugs chart for the day of the 07/03/2006, the day prior to Melissa's planned murder, but once again, notes began to record her eyes as fixed and dilated. It would seem the drops were reapplied prior to Melissa's parents being able to be with her. They most certainly have something to hide by not giving defence the drug chart of that day and refusing me it now, although I am entitled to it.

Prep for murder 4

This is part of a document the hospital sent CYFS straight after Melissa's operation, well before any neurological tests were completed as to prognosis. Melissa was to be kept alive, not to help her, but to run tests on her, gathering evidence.

Prep for murder 1

The use of Dexamethasone is strongly advised against in the case of traumatic head injury. "Corticosteroids increased short and long-term mortality in adults with traumatic head injury".--------------------- However, if the patient is not accustomed to morphine, this drug enhances the effects of the morphine. Melissa was taken off morphine straight after surgery so she would not get tolerant of small doses. Prior to being denied morphine, she was on 20 micrograms/kg/h. The Dexamethasone was given to her a few hours before her morphine overdose. The overdose rate was 2 milligrams! This is 100x the rate of the previous dose at the time of surgery for therapeutic purpose.------------------------------------------- As can be seen in the first picture Dr Tavey Dorofaeef, paediatric registrar, changed his mind about leaving a paper trail as he went to put the date in. It would totally seem he realised the death certificate would have time of death on it at this stage, and decided not to record the time for the lethal dose. However, the effect is clearly seen in Melissa's vitals graph.