Obstructive authority 7 Crown Law Office, hallelujah they replied!!

These people have been stonewalling me for four years.  They absolutely refuse a coroners inquest, despite the coroner having not met statutory requirments, as this will prove I am not responsible for Melissa's death, but rather Dr Jones poor decision is the reason they wouldn't give Melissa a chance later on.

In one of my beating around the bush replies from the Crown Law Office, they told me there had to be new evidence to have a coroners inquest.  Here's my latest letter to them which pretty much is a repeat of the four years worth, but very simplified for them.  I refer to "new evidence" from the main Crown Prosecution 'expert' himself in the form of his article "Patterns ofstructural head injury in children younger than 3 years: a ten year review of 519 patients".

This contradicts what he said at trial, although he knew the truth before the research was completed and published four years later.  Dr Patrick Kelly's 'research' “In older children (6m-3y), subdural hemorrhage was more common after minor falls (<1m 49%)”.  This is the opposite of what he said at my trial despite his research being in its 6^th year, when he said if a child had a short fall it would have fractures, not subdural haemorrhages.  

He was trying to the very end to ram shaken baby down the juries throats, to do his upmost at helping Dr Jones save face in committing perjury to match the mistaken diagnosis.  Even to the point of trial there were two totally different causes of death offered to the jury and they were free to guess where all the medical information that was way over their heads would fit in to either.  Both causes of death are totally different, which just goes to show how the Crown can get away with anything.

One of Patrick Kellys favorite tactics is also so say that no evidence does not mean it didn't happen.  So people do not have a shit-show of proving innocence, not that I was meant to!!!! And the Crown are let off the hook of proving guilt.  How does one prove what didn't happen?  They got to be as vague as they liked and to be supported by the judge to do so.

Up until now the Crown Law Office has refused to answer all my questions and provide what the law says they should.  That is how how Law authorities are in this country.  They repeatedly do a finger to that they are meant to uphold.  I don't envisage a reply from them at all.

Oh wow, they did reply.  After my reminder e-mail this morning and three months of being stonewalled, they sent a copy and paste reply within minutes.  Of course it is nothing new.  They just parroted the same old same old.  But they did tell me if I was not happy with the Coroners decision to go to the head coroner.  I did and he forwarded my correspondance to the Crown Law Office and refused to discuss anything with me, telling me to go through them.  Crown Law Office also told me I could go to the Solicitor general.  I requested that long ago, and they refused to send my correspondance to him and he made the Crown Law Office take control of that too whilst also refusing to correspond with me.  This agency is the most corrupt, beligerant one I reckon we have in NZ.  They are meant to uphold the law, but the law is there for their convenience to  twist around however they like and to do a finger to as they see fit.

Patrick Kelly, statistic manipulator

Coming soon, a journal article written by Dr Patrick Kelly who committed perjury at my trial to save Dr Jones hide and to make sure the judge could accept against the evidence "extremely violent shaken baby" as Dr Jones diagnosed as an excuse to neglect Melissa and refuse her a life saving operation.

This article reflects extremely well how Dr Kelly manipulates statistics for self glory and to have ODD with other professional researchers.

The "research" of this paper was 6 years in during my trial in which it showed a large percentage of young children get subdural haemorrhages from accidental short falls WITHOUT fractures, ie not enough force for a fracture.  However, at trial Patrick Kelly said he sees fractures in short falls and wouldn't expect to see subdural haemorrhages.  In the conclusion of his 'research" he twists around the results to say they must mean the falls were not accidental.  Of course if a fruit is not an apple it has to be a pear!  He backs up his assumption that is out of his area of expertise, by saying he must be correct as four people were later convicted of the injuries.  One of those he is referring to is me.

Does anyone else see what is happening here?  Patrick Kelly commits perjury at trial to get the people convicted, then says he must be right as they got convicted.  He also uses his previous equally devious and dubious "research" in his reference list and as the 'evidence' that supports him.  And when one looks at his reference list, it is all extremist unprofessional like-minded people he reads only.

Dr Kelly is all out for his own ego and manipulating statistics.  He is not humble and for children in the least.  His "research", coming from me who knows how to conduct correct scientific report, is laughable; unfortunately fooling so many and convenient for the Crown to use for their agendas against professional research.

All of Patrick Kellys "research" should so be taken with a pinch of salt as he told the jury of all the truths I said of how Melissa was in my care and her development.  I find the journals that publish his work of poor quality, but of course maybe they do not know of Dr Kellys conflict of interests in his so called 'research'.

Dr Jones kills another child and gets to carry on as though nothing happened again!

The department of internal affairs issued me a death certificate for Melissa which has the incorrect date of death on it and cause of death as "subject to coroners findings".  I initially got a very helpful person and couldn't believe my luck that a government agency was going to do as they ought.  She contacted the coroners and was sent a letter saying there was no coroners inquest.   She refused to give me a copy of this letter, but she received a subsequent one that said there has been a coroners inquest when the Coroners Office then remembered they are meant to pretend there was.  So once again Internal Affairs contacted them and asked for the findings.

Any person is entitled to coroners findings (S28) and the Crown Law Office and Coroners Office have been doing a finger to the laws, not only by refusing to have an inquest when new information comes to light (S60), having coroners findings, to hear from me what happened, to make recommendations based upon the death; but also by obstructing the issue of findings to me come hell or high water.  All the agencies close rank.

Now the coroner has contacted internal affairs a third time, obviously telling her I am the accused who supposedly caused Melissa's death and she should not co-operate with me; as she now refuses to reply to any of my e-mails or tell me the findings and insists on telling me by phone only; a trick the Crown Law Office also do to save me having evidence to take to a lawyer.

If the coroners alleged findings are what Judge Lynton Stevens, now an appeal court judge, ruled as "fact" at my sentencing illegally against the evidence, this of course is strong enough to take further action.  Yet if the alleged findings support what I told them all happened, Melissa had a short distance fall and hit her head, then this shows Dr David Jones is responsible for Melissa's death by refusing the operation his surgeon recommended for her to survive and make a full recovery.  So of course the Crown do not want me to have that either.

Once the ball of perjury and corruption gets rolling, it snowballs and snowballs, because the government departments will fight to the death to save face.  Children's lives don't matter to them when its about saving face or money.

All these years I had been fooling myself that behind closed doors Melissa's death at the hands of Dr Jones made a difference in a positive way in the hospital system.  Now I find he is carrying on with neglect of children and misconduct and causing other children's deaths.  And yet no-one ever holds him to account.  You can break the law however you please, so long as you are a doctor, judge or coroner.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/bay-of-plenty-times/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503343&objectid=10969878

Neuropathologist, about Melissa's case: All standards are relevant until the real one shows up.

Wise words from others who also know

How little do they see what is, who frame their hasty judgments upon that which seems.  Robert Southey.  

Richard Cardinal Cushing: When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.

Nelson Mandela: “The justice system is not about upholding truth, law or justice, but of molding an ideal required of society”. 

Montesquieu: The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.

 Jonathan Swift: Ambition often puts men upon doing the meanest offices: so climbing is performed in the same posture with creeping.  

Grover Cleveland: There is no calamity which a great nation can invite which equals that which follows a supine submission to wrong and injustice.

Benjamin Disraeli: What is crime amongst the multitude, is only vice among the few

Ambrose Bierce: Politics is the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

Ambrose Bierce: Justice is a commodity which in a more or less adulterated condition the State sells to the citizen as a reward for his allegiance, taxes and personal service.

 Seigneur de Saint-Evremond: The censure of those who are opposed to us, is the highest commendation that can be given us.

William Rounseville Alger: Men often make up in wrath what they want in reason. 

Neuropathologist, about Melissa's case: All standards are relevant until the real one shows up.

Daniel J Boorstin: Your greatest obstacle to personal growth isn’t ignorance; it’s the illusion of knowledge.

obstructive authority 6 Coroners Office

   

Despite the coroner telling me in his letter of 18th September 2014 that the Soliciter General must decide if a coroners inquest is to be continued; the law allows coroners to decide this themselves, as I knew the whole time.  The Crown Law Office have been saying the past three years that they will not have an inquest as there is no new evidence, and the Coroners have been saying it's not for them to decide.  There is easily new evidence due to the perjury at my trial of the three Crown experts who initially all supported it was a low level fall, but then changed their minds when I was enquiring as to doctors conduct in medical neglect manslaughter and the murder by morhpine overdose of Melissa.  Dr K himself, the chief Crown 'expert' who contributed most to getting me convicted and has the most face to save in this case, himself, has published very contrary research to what he said at trial, although six years into that 10 year review at the time of trial.
     Anyway, the Coroner has decided to have a coroners inquest for Moko, a child brutally tortured to death recently, despite the courts having got people convicted.  I have been told by the coroners Office and Crown Law Office repeatedly the past three years, that the Coroner had to go by the "facts" of my case (although they refuse to tell me by what "facts" they went by) as it was against the public interest to pay for "another" hearing that had already been the means by which the truth should have been aired.
     That is not the only lie told to me by the Crown Law Office and Coroners Office.  More to come in obstruction authority Crown Law Office.  Of course the difference in Mokos case and Melissa's, is that I am not responsible for Melissa's death.  I have just been scapegoated for it.  Doctors will never be held to account in this country.  They can break the law as they please.  Moko didn't survive long enough for the doctors to refuse him treatment then euthanase him.
     The correspondance e-mail of November 5th 2014 outlines the laws the Crown Law Office and Coroners Office are breaking, by not having a coroners inquest for Melissa.  They have an incorrect date of death and no cause on the death certificate and yet teh Crown Law Office and coroners keep parroting over and over again that they have had a coroners inquest, as their excuse to not "have another".  They have not had one.

Prep for murder 7

It didn't matter how Melissa was improving and progressing.  She was very stable by hospital notes and breathing 1:1 with the machine at the stage they decided to pull the plug followed by a morphine overdose, when she refused to die and great pressure was put on her parents by government authorities not wanting to do unpaid overtime, wanting it done already.  Them saying her SEP's were absent and equivocal (questionable/ambiguous), her eyes were fixed and dilated, that she had Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI) and that she showed no neurological function, supported their plan to euthanase her.  All of these excuses were untrue and proven to be incorrect.The SEP's result gave a perfectly normal reading for the left hemishpere of the brain.  As can be seen in the hospital note, one eye was not fixed and dilated and was responding.  That hospital note also shows Melissa's movements and neurological function, only a few hours before they pulled the plug.   However, I believe she was again given paralytics and sedatives to make her much more unresponsive prior to her parents arrival at her bedside.