They can't even get the obvious basics right!

Does anyone else see something amiss here, or is it just me??? Tauranga doctors who immediately diagnosed "shaken baby" when Melissa was admitted on the 4th January 2006, also happened to say Melissa would die any moment and that was their excuse to neglect her and not give her emergency surgery offered by the Tauranga neurosurgeon. The judge gave them their own way to rule it was 'shaken baby", but isn't saying she died on a day other than that in which she did so, a bit out there? How did I allegedly kill Melissa before she was dead?