Conviction = no coroners inquest

If New Zealands child abuse death rate is as terrible as Dr K, Crown specialist paediatrician tells us all it is, then why are the number of people charged such a drop in the bucket? Because there is no evidence to say it was inflicted????? And yet NZ statistics and dramatic haters in society will go by what the Doc says regardless! I know why the Crime Law office and head coroner refuse to have a coroners inquest for Melissa. They know the truth that she died as a result of not being treated, not of what Dr K says of it. Melissa experienced a low level fall and inadvertently hit her head. She should have been operated on immediately. But Dr J, Tauranga hospital specialist paediatrician made the call that it was solely ‘shaken baby’ and treatment would be futile and Dr K backed him up adding severe extremely violent 'shaken baby'. The autopsy proved them very wrong and they tried to sweep it under the mat that Melissa died due to their negligence and euthanasia. But they didn't count on me not taking it laying down, so I had to be convicted at all cost. Now they refuse a coroners inquest as they do not want it made public that two paediatricians are responsible for Melissa's manslaughter and two doctors of her murder. The charge was withdrawn with police saying 'no suspicious circumstances as what I said happened matched the evidence". But then a coroners inquest was going to be held. Suddenly someone needs to be scape-goated, whose that gonna be? Certainly not a doctor who has put himself on one of the highest pedestals around. One that overlooks all people. Well done on getting me convicted on your total BS Dr K. I now see fully why that had to be. So your dirty secret could be kept so. Conviction = no coroners inquest = Drs free to do it over and over again smirking to themselves. The law is all pick and choose for people on pedestals.