Right to life, but not for Melissa

So now I see that what has happened with Melissa has occurred for a very long time with authorities condoning it. No wonder the closing ranks is so down pat and tight. "This right to refuse treatment does not extend to children and babies in New Zealand. Because children are dependent upon adults for all their needs special conditions override this right". But obviously this is lip service too because doctors then had to alter the law to cover their own asses. "Doctors successfully campaigned to dilute the sections of the Crimes Act dealing with medical manslaughter so that now no action will be taken in most cases of negligence resulting in death. Yet parents can face the trauma of a criminal trial." (3) I guess doctors wanted the law changed of refusal to offer treatment in case they unwittingly did not provide what they should have. I believe the majority of doctors would have liked the courtesy of being able to make mistakes like any human being does and as they are. But manipulative doctors, such as K, crown specialist paediatrician, Gabrielle Nuthall, intensivist, and Tavey Dorofaeef, paediatric registrar, are exploiting that clause to deliberately pick and choose who they will treat, refuse treatment of and euthanase because they know they will never be held accountable, then using that as 'research', to manipulate statistics and supposed injuries for their own glory, and vengeance, rather then the love of a child’s wellbeing.